But only a little bit. I quote the Telegraph who then quotes the Times.
Fascinating synopsis, Telegraph! Readers, I do recommend both the Times (link above) for your perusal of a usually avoided - by liberal media - topic: flaws within liberal entities of any kind.Is the New York Times being guest edited by Rush Limbaugh? Today it runs with a fascinating takedown of the Clinton Foundation – that vast vanity project that conservatives are wary of criticising for being seen to attack a body that tries to do good. But the liberal NYT has no such scruples. The killer quote is this:For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.
And for Rush Limbaugh? I expect he'll address the reference to himself today, laugh about it, and then say something to the effect that the Times doesn't go far enough and that they're only printing this now so that it doesn't come out at a more damaging time for Hillary 2016 and they're trying to save their "objective" skins by reporting anti-Democrat stuff every once in awhile.
We'll see if I'm right come 12 PM ET on radio nationwide. Or visit rushlimbaugh.com. after PM 5 ET to view his transcripts.
He did! Here's the transcript.